The Durk Pearson & Sandy Shaw®
Life Extension NewsTM
Volume 11 No. 4 • July 2008

U.S. Supreme Court Rules on Right to Freedom from Unreasonable Searches and Seizures

In one of the best Supreme Court decisions (written by Scalia) on “privacy” in recent years, the Court ruled in 2001 that “Where . . . the government uses a [‘sense-enhancing technology’] device that is not in general public use, to explore details of the home that would previously have been unknowable without physical intrusion, the surveillance is a ‘search’ and is presumptively unreasonable without a warrant.” Kyllo v. U.S., 533 U.S. 27 (2001).

D&S comment: Durk helped the lead attorney for Kyllo to prepare the arguments in this case.

FREE Subscription

  • You're just getting started! We have published thousands of scientific health articles. Stay updated and maintain your health.

    It's free to your e-mail inbox and you can unsubscribe at any time.
    Loading Indicator